QUIET ARCHITECTURE
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-ca-cm-building-type-boring-buildings-20171119-htmlstory.html
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
globe and place and how everything connects
summary
I find big things easier to comprehend than little things. Since most people (in the Western world at any rate) are just the opposite, I’m always going against the grain. I can’t find any corroboration for my view that it is very easy to correct Earth’s climate and other critical woes if we think big enough. And it’s tempting to go off in a corner and leave the world to its dealings.
Despite what astronauts say about Earth’s unity, beauty and fragility when seen from afar, policy to give meaning to that vision is absent. The awe-stricken astronauts were working at the level of sensibility and feeling, and these are never the concern of policy.
After I wrote my first blog post (“How To Do Everything,” below) I heard about the book “Endgame” by Derrick Jensen, for which the author won The Press Action Person of the Year award. Although I’m puzzled by Jensen’s radical views and by the acclaim given him, what he wrote stopped me in my tracks. Could it be that I received no corroboration for my views because there was none to be found within the broad culture?
Among the premises in Endgame :
Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.
I reread my post, and the main fault I now find with it is the perhaps naïve assumption that it lies within the power of government to save the planet from the dire consequences wrought by industrial civilization. Ain’t gonna happen, most likely.
But I question whether direct acts of violence against civilization (as Jensen advocates) is the answer – these will most likely happen anyway -- or whether it is feasible, as an alternate strategy, to take peaceful but subversive actions to protect and restore the planet. As an example, what if it were feasible to cover dysfunctional paving everywhere (paving that does not use the sun’s energy to do anything useful) with vegetation (a simple, non-technologic solution to climate change)? It can’t be denied that looking at Earth as a seamless orb that depends on vegetation for its survival is something that civilization has proven hopeless at doing.
During the coming year I want to investigate, to my satisfaction, how or whether the broader society, driven by a revolution in the humanities and the arts, could potentially reverse this direction. (Examining the feasibility of a worldwide survey of land-use plans is one possible way to start.)
Can what is harmful in civilization be transcended through civilization itself?
Despite what astronauts say about Earth’s unity, beauty and fragility when seen from afar, policy to give meaning to that vision is absent. The awe-stricken astronauts were working at the level of sensibility and feeling, and these are never the concern of policy.
After I wrote my first blog post (“How To Do Everything,” below) I heard about the book “Endgame” by Derrick Jensen, for which the author won The Press Action Person of the Year award. Although I’m puzzled by Jensen’s radical views and by the acclaim given him, what he wrote stopped me in my tracks. Could it be that I received no corroboration for my views because there was none to be found within the broad culture?
Among the premises in Endgame :
Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.
I reread my post, and the main fault I now find with it is the perhaps naïve assumption that it lies within the power of government to save the planet from the dire consequences wrought by industrial civilization. Ain’t gonna happen, most likely.
But I question whether direct acts of violence against civilization (as Jensen advocates) is the answer – these will most likely happen anyway -- or whether it is feasible, as an alternate strategy, to take peaceful but subversive actions to protect and restore the planet. As an example, what if it were feasible to cover dysfunctional paving everywhere (paving that does not use the sun’s energy to do anything useful) with vegetation (a simple, non-technologic solution to climate change)? It can’t be denied that looking at Earth as a seamless orb that depends on vegetation for its survival is something that civilization has proven hopeless at doing.
During the coming year I want to investigate, to my satisfaction, how or whether the broader society, driven by a revolution in the humanities and the arts, could potentially reverse this direction. (Examining the feasibility of a worldwide survey of land-use plans is one possible way to start.)
Can what is harmful in civilization be transcended through civilization itself?
Posts
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(131)
-
▼
November
(34)
- JAMAICANS ARE AFRICANS, WHATEVER THEIR RACE (A po...
- CARS "I think that cars today are almost the exac...
- xabier says: November 24, 2017 at 7:30 am Ther...
- One Oil Spill per Day http://www.latimes.com/ente...
- QUIET ARCHITECTURE http://www.latimes.com/enterta...
- SAB walking tour http://www.georgianjamaica.org/b...
- We represent a Facebook Group called "Restoring ...
- WASTE: TOWARD SOME UNDERSTANDING OF – Waste:...
- Google SAB Maphttps://www.google.com/maps/@18.4401...
- NORTH COAST ARCHITECTURE https://www.youtube.com/...
- THE ECONOMY OF WASTE What I learn on FW has an un...
- HUXLEY It works best when you have no resources ...
- CARDBOARD CITY http://www.smh.com.au/entertainmen...
- Trevor Burrowes This house could be showing us a ...
- Tim Groves, I think I’ve already grasped w...
- Google SAB Map https://www.google.com/maps/@18.44...
- Rastafari-TV http://rastafari.tv/memories-west-in...
- Importing vendors to SAB from Kingston To Idris J...
- A-I Highway John Rickman OK But the deed is alrea...
- Dennis Higgins Update KEEPING YOU POSTED Ret...
- China Thinks Strategically http://www.ianwelsh.ne...
- China' Role in St. Ann's Bay (SAB) I’m le...
- CHINA AND THE WORLDI come from a place that depend...
- Google Map https://www.google.com/maps/place/Tota...
- My Humble Opinions Role of Jamaican Immigran...
- Trevor Burrowes A marine master Plan for t...
- Villa development near St. Ann's Bay https://www....
- Google Satellite Map Desperately Searching for Bl...
- Jamaica Ntl Trust Heritage Sites http://www.jnht....
- The St. Ann Homecoming and Heritage Foundation was...
- BLUE BOWL I was more concerned with the sagging v...
- https://www.google.com/maps/uv?hl=en&pb=%211s0x8ed...
- Sartres-The Human Concition http://www.bu.edu/wcp...
-
▼
November
(34)
1 comment:
https://www.planetizen.com/news/2017/11/95957-rejecting-flashy-forms-new-architecture-embraces-boring
Actually, the images presented are still too full of themselves. They really haven't mastered "visual silence," One thing they must address (and that is not evident in any of the images) is to fit in with the context structures. Here they can't be ignored or avoided, but that is exactly what they need to be. They should be noticed from the context only after a second glance.
This can't afford to be a trend. The stakes are too high.
Post a Comment