Among the policies that are flat out not working are:
affordable shelter,
the destruction of tourism through destruction of architectural heritage,
the destruction of food producing land through mindless bauxite mining practices,
the destruction of fisheries through mindless coastal developments,
the destruction of coastal ecologies that could contain sea level rise...
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
globe and place and how everything connects
summary
I find big things easier to comprehend than little things. Since most people (in the Western world at any rate) are just the opposite, I’m always going against the grain. I can’t find any corroboration for my view that it is very easy to correct Earth’s climate and other critical woes if we think big enough. And it’s tempting to go off in a corner and leave the world to its dealings.
Despite what astronauts say about Earth’s unity, beauty and fragility when seen from afar, policy to give meaning to that vision is absent. The awe-stricken astronauts were working at the level of sensibility and feeling, and these are never the concern of policy.
After I wrote my first blog post (“How To Do Everything,” below) I heard about the book “Endgame” by Derrick Jensen, for which the author won The Press Action Person of the Year award. Although I’m puzzled by Jensen’s radical views and by the acclaim given him, what he wrote stopped me in my tracks. Could it be that I received no corroboration for my views because there was none to be found within the broad culture?
Among the premises in Endgame :
Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.
I reread my post, and the main fault I now find with it is the perhaps naïve assumption that it lies within the power of government to save the planet from the dire consequences wrought by industrial civilization. Ain’t gonna happen, most likely.
But I question whether direct acts of violence against civilization (as Jensen advocates) is the answer – these will most likely happen anyway -- or whether it is feasible, as an alternate strategy, to take peaceful but subversive actions to protect and restore the planet. As an example, what if it were feasible to cover dysfunctional paving everywhere (paving that does not use the sun’s energy to do anything useful) with vegetation (a simple, non-technologic solution to climate change)? It can’t be denied that looking at Earth as a seamless orb that depends on vegetation for its survival is something that civilization has proven hopeless at doing.
During the coming year I want to investigate, to my satisfaction, how or whether the broader society, driven by a revolution in the humanities and the arts, could potentially reverse this direction. (Examining the feasibility of a worldwide survey of land-use plans is one possible way to start.)
Can what is harmful in civilization be transcended through civilization itself?
Despite what astronauts say about Earth’s unity, beauty and fragility when seen from afar, policy to give meaning to that vision is absent. The awe-stricken astronauts were working at the level of sensibility and feeling, and these are never the concern of policy.
After I wrote my first blog post (“How To Do Everything,” below) I heard about the book “Endgame” by Derrick Jensen, for which the author won The Press Action Person of the Year award. Although I’m puzzled by Jensen’s radical views and by the acclaim given him, what he wrote stopped me in my tracks. Could it be that I received no corroboration for my views because there was none to be found within the broad culture?
Among the premises in Endgame :
Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.
I reread my post, and the main fault I now find with it is the perhaps naïve assumption that it lies within the power of government to save the planet from the dire consequences wrought by industrial civilization. Ain’t gonna happen, most likely.
But I question whether direct acts of violence against civilization (as Jensen advocates) is the answer – these will most likely happen anyway -- or whether it is feasible, as an alternate strategy, to take peaceful but subversive actions to protect and restore the planet. As an example, what if it were feasible to cover dysfunctional paving everywhere (paving that does not use the sun’s energy to do anything useful) with vegetation (a simple, non-technologic solution to climate change)? It can’t be denied that looking at Earth as a seamless orb that depends on vegetation for its survival is something that civilization has proven hopeless at doing.
During the coming year I want to investigate, to my satisfaction, how or whether the broader society, driven by a revolution in the humanities and the arts, could potentially reverse this direction. (Examining the feasibility of a worldwide survey of land-use plans is one possible way to start.)
Can what is harmful in civilization be transcended through civilization itself?
Posts
Blog Archive
-
▼
2019
(157)
-
▼
July
(29)
- VALUING THE NEW Thanks to VJ for valuing the old....
- Quick Reflections (incompleteness and impressioni...
- GARVEY From:e. To:trevoroche Date:Sat, Ma...
- FACEBOOK (a contrary opinion) I have misg...
- HAMILTON BLDG From:e. To:trevoroche Date:...
- Quonset Hut Pop Up Re: Photos from your exhibit(...
- EPA as model From:e. To:Trevoroche Date:S...
- John McHue It's been some time and I hope it's be...
- Among the policies that are flat out not working ...
- More Mark Unread Flag Print Messag...
- Building Paradigm From:e. To:trevoroche D...
- Importance of Jamaican Architecture From:e....
- Aesthetics (I wonder if any publisher would bite ...
- Dear Penny, One of those "can't sleep so get up...
- A TOURIST PROGRAM FOR SAB From:e. To:trevo...
- Battered old vehicles as art From:e. To:tr...
- Monastic Poverty From:e. To:trevoroche Date:Fr...
- STEVEN GOLDING AND THE TIGER From:e. To:TREVORO...
- Road Signs From:e. To:trevoroche Date:Sat, Jul...
- Art from Architecture From:e. To:trevoroche Da...
- OUR FOURTH OF JULY? From:e. To:trevoroche Date...
- More Mark Unread Flag Print M...
- A work plan From:e. To:trevoroche Date:Tue, Ju...
- THE SAN MARCOS PLAN This won't be easy. But we...
- Our Home From:e. To:trevoroche Date:Wed, Jul 1...
- Patching and straightening From:e. To:trevoroch...
- DOLPHIN HEAD, JAMAICA https://queenscommonwealthc...
- WHY WOODEN LOUVERS MATTER The question is more...
- BHUTAN AND TOURISM https://blog.thinkwhere.com/20...
-
▼
July
(29)
No comments:
Post a Comment