18x18
The size was recommended by a friend (who has been my main collector). He is very efficient and business oriented, and I decided I'd keep with the format for some time yet. The project allows me to break out of my shell a bit, so I'm thinking, when opportunity arises, to show mostly 18x18 pieces, all to be placed on the cardboard booths I'm making and that can be free standing and displayed anywhere. The booths are also based on a similar look (aesthetic) to the square pieces.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
globe and place and how everything connects
summary
I find big things easier to comprehend than little things. Since most people (in the Western world at any rate) are just the opposite, I’m always going against the grain. I can’t find any corroboration for my view that it is very easy to correct Earth’s climate and other critical woes if we think big enough. And it’s tempting to go off in a corner and leave the world to its dealings.
Despite what astronauts say about Earth’s unity, beauty and fragility when seen from afar, policy to give meaning to that vision is absent. The awe-stricken astronauts were working at the level of sensibility and feeling, and these are never the concern of policy.
After I wrote my first blog post (“How To Do Everything,” below) I heard about the book “Endgame” by Derrick Jensen, for which the author won The Press Action Person of the Year award. Although I’m puzzled by Jensen’s radical views and by the acclaim given him, what he wrote stopped me in my tracks. Could it be that I received no corroboration for my views because there was none to be found within the broad culture?
Among the premises in Endgame :
Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.
I reread my post, and the main fault I now find with it is the perhaps naïve assumption that it lies within the power of government to save the planet from the dire consequences wrought by industrial civilization. Ain’t gonna happen, most likely.
But I question whether direct acts of violence against civilization (as Jensen advocates) is the answer – these will most likely happen anyway -- or whether it is feasible, as an alternate strategy, to take peaceful but subversive actions to protect and restore the planet. As an example, what if it were feasible to cover dysfunctional paving everywhere (paving that does not use the sun’s energy to do anything useful) with vegetation (a simple, non-technologic solution to climate change)? It can’t be denied that looking at Earth as a seamless orb that depends on vegetation for its survival is something that civilization has proven hopeless at doing.
During the coming year I want to investigate, to my satisfaction, how or whether the broader society, driven by a revolution in the humanities and the arts, could potentially reverse this direction. (Examining the feasibility of a worldwide survey of land-use plans is one possible way to start.)
Can what is harmful in civilization be transcended through civilization itself?
Despite what astronauts say about Earth’s unity, beauty and fragility when seen from afar, policy to give meaning to that vision is absent. The awe-stricken astronauts were working at the level of sensibility and feeling, and these are never the concern of policy.
After I wrote my first blog post (“How To Do Everything,” below) I heard about the book “Endgame” by Derrick Jensen, for which the author won The Press Action Person of the Year award. Although I’m puzzled by Jensen’s radical views and by the acclaim given him, what he wrote stopped me in my tracks. Could it be that I received no corroboration for my views because there was none to be found within the broad culture?
Among the premises in Endgame :
Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.
I reread my post, and the main fault I now find with it is the perhaps naïve assumption that it lies within the power of government to save the planet from the dire consequences wrought by industrial civilization. Ain’t gonna happen, most likely.
But I question whether direct acts of violence against civilization (as Jensen advocates) is the answer – these will most likely happen anyway -- or whether it is feasible, as an alternate strategy, to take peaceful but subversive actions to protect and restore the planet. As an example, what if it were feasible to cover dysfunctional paving everywhere (paving that does not use the sun’s energy to do anything useful) with vegetation (a simple, non-technologic solution to climate change)? It can’t be denied that looking at Earth as a seamless orb that depends on vegetation for its survival is something that civilization has proven hopeless at doing.
During the coming year I want to investigate, to my satisfaction, how or whether the broader society, driven by a revolution in the humanities and the arts, could potentially reverse this direction. (Examining the feasibility of a worldwide survey of land-use plans is one possible way to start.)
Can what is harmful in civilization be transcended through civilization itself?
Posts
Blog Archive
-
▼
2020
(128)
-
▼
May
(34)
- TO ROBERT WILMOT 0XQ4PKN9 (245 KB)
- MY JOHNSON'S GALLERY WEB PAGE https://johnsonsofm...
- KGN GRANTS Dear Kingston Grants, I hope you ...
- RESTORING ST. ANN'S BAY, and other artist follies ...
- NORWICH PRESERVATION Andrew Shekell Trevor Burrow...
- Africa doesn't exist. What we have is the Africa...
- NOTE TO JANET (mrs. patmore on Downton Abbey) I...
- BLACKS IN EUROPEAN ART https://www.dutchnews.nl/f...
- NOTE TO GINA Hi Gina, My thinking in position...
- HOW TO MAKE CARDBOARD BOXES http://cardboardhelp....
- THE PRINTERY ousin David is the Gordon Lodge owne...
- AFRICA AND FEMINISM This sounds true, although I ...
- 18x18 The size was recommended by a friend (who h...
- BRICK https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=382...
- Realism vs Modernism https://search.aol.com/ao...
- A.S. Forrest? Used TinEye to search and found a re...
- SUSAN NK Patsy Pink gave me some names of busine...
- RANDIE ALLIE We're not opposing anything. We're n...
- DeborahAllisonStudio.com I'm glad you are likin...
- PLANNING FOR MADRID "Wha gone bad a maanin, cy...
- MALLS Some market housing, some government housin...
- TOWARD A DESCRIPTION OF THIS FACEBOOK SITE Ma...
- THIRD WORLD FIRST I believe the world order has t...
- ALL JOBS ARE NECESSARY Gail Tverberg says:
- HENDERSON BUILDING
- KUDOS TO THE PM, WOODEN ARCHITECTURE, ARTIST HELP...
- AFCP For Section 2, might I suggest: Facilit...
- JAMAICA IS AFRICA Trevor Burrowes I ratcheted u...
- ICE BOXES DID FOOD GO TO WASTE DURING THE SHUT DO...
- JAMAICA CREATIVE
- TO SUSAN NATHAN KNIGHT Thank you very much indee...
- TREES https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/news/review/revie...
- LISA HANNA Dear MP Hanna, It was very ...
-
▼
May
(34)
No comments:
Post a Comment